[erlang-questions] : Subtle behaviour of Erlang scheduler

[Rickard Green]

Rickard Green wrote:
> 
> Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) wrote:
>>
>> (*) Of course, the recommendation has always been to
>> regard the scheduler as preemptive, and expect your code to be 
>> preemptable whenever possible (that is,
>> between any two operations), so in that sense, SMP
>> merely makes good on this promise. (:
> 
> Yes. We have also introduced the +M command-line flag, in order to try 
> to make it easier to find bugs in Erlang code that doesn't follow those 
> recommendations.
> 

Sorry, it should be +T command-line flag.

BR,
Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB.